RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02229 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 7 Feb 2011 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 13 Dec 10, he received a profile with a recommended release date of 23 Jan 11 for 41 days. He was inadvertently scheduled and tested on 7 Feb 11. He should have been allowed 42-90 days to complete a FA after his recommended release date. As a result, he failed his FA test. In accordance with the governing regulation, if the exemption exceeds 30 days, the member is given 42 days following the expiration of the exemption for training. The earliest he could have been scheduled for testing was 7 Mar 11. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ______________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving on active duty. ______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states on 5 Jul 12, the applicant was asked to provide a copy of his signed fitness assessment score sheet, fitness assessment questionnaire and AF IMT 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, documenting his limitations/exemptions. He did not provide this information. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Aug 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA is in error or unjust. The AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, submitted by the applicant is noted; however, in the absence of the fitness assessment scoresheet, fitness assessment questionnaire and AF IMT 422, requested by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing the record. However, should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his request. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 11 Mar 13, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC- 2012-02229: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 May 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 Aug 12, w/atch. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Aug 12.