RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02394 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 27 December 2011 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The wind speed exceeded limits set by AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, during the cardiovascular portion of the fitness assessment. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of an email from his commander and an AF Form 847, Recommendation for Change of Publication, from his Flight Chief. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Senior Airman (SrA), E-4. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states on 19 June 2012, a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional documentation be submitted, within 30 days, to substantiate his claim. The applicant did not provide the requested documentation. They recommend denial of the request to have the fitness assessment dated 29 December 2011, removed from AFFMS. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 August 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). To date, this office has not received a response. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant's contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA is in error or unjust. The AF Form 847, Recommendation for Change of Publication, from his Flight Chief is noted; however, in the absence of a letter from the local base weather indicating the winds exceeded the maximum 15 mph sustained/20mph gusting during the 27 Dec 11 FA, we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing the record. However, should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his request. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 15 February 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02394: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 April 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 August 2012, w/atchs Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 August 2012. Dear: Reference your application submitted under the provisions of AFI 36-2603 (Section 1552, 10 USC), AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02394. After careful consideration of your application and military records, the Board determined that the evidence you presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice. Accordingly, the Board denied your application. You have the right to submit newly discovered relevant evidence for consideration by the Board. In the absence of such additional evidence, a further review of your application is not possible. Attachment: Record of Board Proceedings 3 Office of the Assistant Secretary