RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02904 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C – Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service,” be changed to allow him to reenter the military. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was having trouble with training for the job he was selected. He believes he was not given the right judgment by being discharged. He is asking for a second chance. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 28 June 2011 in Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 2F011, Fuel Helper. On 16 September 2011, the applicant was diagnosed by a psychiatrist as having an Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood. It was identified that his disorder was so severe that his ability to function effectively in a military environment was significantly impaired. On 25 October 2011, his commander notified the applicant of his intent to recommend him for an entry-level separation under the provisions of Air Force Program Directive (AFPD) 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations, and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36- 3208, paragraph 5.11.9.3, for having a mental disorder. The applicant acknowledged his commander’s intent; and, waived his rights to consult counsel and to submit statements in his own behalf. On 26 October 2011, his commander recommended the applicant be given an entry-level separation without probation or rehabilitation. After the Assistant Staff Judge Advocate found the case to be legally sufficient, the discharge authority approved the recommended separation and directed the applicant be administratively separated under the provisions of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208, paragraph 5.11.9.3, with an entry- level separation. The applicant received an uncharacterized, entry-level separation effective 3 November 2011, in the grade of airman (E-2). His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects his RE code as “2C” and a narrative reason for separation as “Adjustment Disorder.” He served four months and six days on active duty. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant’s RE Code of “2C” is required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, based on his involuntary discharge with an honorable characterization of service. The applicant does not provide evidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE Code. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 August 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02904 in Executive Session on 4 April 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02904: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Jun 12. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 9 Aug 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Aug 12.