RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03145 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 3 Aug 10 be removed from the 
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was denied the 42 day period for reconditioning before being 
administered the FA test. 

 

He received his new profile on 22 Jun 10 that was identical to 
his previous profiles; however, his AF Form 422, Notification of 
Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, dated 19 Jul 10, 
required him to take the 1 mile walk test, which he was 
previously exempt . He was required by his command to take a FA 
only 16 days after the change in his profile. 

 

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the Regular 
Air Force in the grade of technical sergeant. 

 

The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: 

 

 DATE SCORE 

 

* 3 Aug 10 UNSATISFACTORY 

 12 Nov 10 UNSATISFACTORY 

 9 Feb 11 SATISFACTORY 

 17 Aug 11 UNSATISFACTORY 

 30 Nov 11 UNSATISFACTORY 

 13 Jun 12 UNSATISFACTORY 

 4 Sep 12 EXEMPT 

 

*Contested FA score. 

 


The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial and states that the governing 
regulations state that upon expiration of the exemption or when 
the Exercise Physiologist Fitness Program Manager (EP/FPM) clears 
the exempted component of an assessment, the member will meet 
their next scheduled FA. Further, if the exemption exceeded 30 
days, the member is allowed 42 days for training following the 
expiration of the component exemption. The applicant tested 46 
days after his AF Form 422 expired on 19 Jun 10. 

 

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 29 Oct 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issue involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03145 in Executive Session on 12 Feb 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Jul 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 17 Oct 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair