RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03345 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His former spouse be added as the beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. ___________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He added his current wife as his SBP beneficiary in 2011. He believes he was misinformed when he made this election. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant retired from the Air Force on 1 April 2001. On 25 February 2013, the applicant was provided an advisory (Exhibit D) prepared by SAF/GCM on similar cases considered by the Board. The Board has been advised that it should not consider cases involving disputed claims between competing beneficiaries unless a court of competent jurisdiction has ruled in the case or pushes the AFBCMR to make such determination. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit B. ___________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR does not provide a recommendation as the application involves two potential SBP beneficiaries. Prior to the applicant’s retirement, he elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay. He and his former spouse divorced on 25 November 2002. The Voluntary Separation and Property Settlement Agreement did not clearly and satisfactorily address the SBP. There is no evidence he or his former wife submitted a valid former spouse election within the year following their divorce decree, as required by law. However, he continued to pay the SBP premiums. The applicant married his current spouse on 21 August 2009. On 15 December 2009, he added her as the SBP beneficiary. He was issued a refund of overpaid premiums on 23 August 2010. The complete DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B. ___________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 17 September 2012 and 15 February 2013, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C and D). As of this date, this office has received no response. ___________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The applicant has not demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist as required for this Board to grant relief in cases of competing SBP beneficiaries. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case and his deemed election for his current spouse to gain entitlement to the benefit. By operation of law, she is now the eligible beneficiary. Therefore, we are precluded from granting the applicant’s request as there has been no showing of extraordinary circumstances. Unless his current spouse relinquishes her entitlement, we find no basis to grant the applicant’s request. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ___________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-03345 in Executive Session on 7 May 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Jul 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIAR, dated 30 Aug 12. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 25 Feb 13, w/atchs. Panel Chair