RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03413 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code 6H, which denotes “Pending Discharge in 
accordance with ANGR 39-10 – Involuntary (ANG Only),” be removed 
from his records. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He would like to reenlist in the military. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

NGB/A1PP recommends denial. A1PP states his discharge was 
accomplished in accordance with Air Force policies and 
procedures, and no evidence was provided to show an error or 
injustice has occurred. The RE code 6H is an Air Force 
sanctioned and recognized code and is found in the Military 
Personnel Data System. This code applies to the Air National 
Guard and is used when a member is not selected for further 
retention in accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and 
Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the 
Air Force. This is not a derogatory code. Therefore, should 
the applicant wish to enlist with another branch of service, it 
will not be a barrier to his enlistment. 

 

The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 



 

On 9 Nov 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2012-
03413 in Executive Session on 28 Mar 2013, under the provisions 
of AFI 36-2603: 

 

Panel Chair 

Member 

Member 

 

 



The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-03413: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jun 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 21 Aug 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 2012.