RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03465 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 19 Jun 2012 be removed from 
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He had a medical condition during the FA which was validated by 
a medical evaluation. 

 

His section commander requested the FA in question be removed 
from the AFFMS. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states that on 15 Aug 2012, 
a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional 
documentation. Specifically, AF Form 108, Physical Fitness 
Education and Intervention Processing; AF Form 422, Notification 
of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status; AF Form 469, Duty 
Limiting Condition Report, signed score sheet and questionnaire 
for the contested FA. The member did not provide the requested 
documentation. 

 

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 9 Nov 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
C). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA 
is in error or unjust. The memorandum from his section 
commander is noted; however, in the absence of the documentation 
requested by AFPC/DPSIM in their 15 Aug 2012, memorandum to the 
applicant, we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing 
the record. However, should the applicant provide such 
evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his request. In 
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 18 Apr 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 



The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket number 
BC-2012-03465 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jul 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 29 Oct 2012, w/atch. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 2012.