RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04225 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 6, Place of Entry (POE) onto Active Duty, should read San Antonio, Texas, rather than Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was born and raised in Austin, Texas. He joined the Air Force Delayed Enlistment Program (DEP) between his junior and senior year of High School. He went to the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) and entered the military from San Antonio, Texas. His complete submission is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. The applicant’s initial DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, dated 21 Jan 86 and confirmed on 3 Jun 86, reflects Oklahoma City MEPS as his place of entry. According to the governing instructions, a member’s initial DD Form 4 is the source document for Home of Record/POE. There was no evidence of an error or justification provided that warrants changing his POE. The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Oct 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board would like to point-out that should the applicant provide documentation substantiating his home of record as San Antonio, the Board would be willing to reconsider his request. However, in the absence of such evidence, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04225 in Executive Session on 25 Apr 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2012-04225 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Aug 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, APFC/DPSIPE, dated 4 Oct 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Oct 12.