RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04546 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: These awards are not listed on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 3 Jul 69. According to the applicant’s DD Form 214, he served in Indochina but did not serve in Vietnam or Korea; however, it does not indicate the length of time served in each location or in what capacity. On 8 Jun 73, the applicant was honorably discharged at the expiration of his term of service and was credited with seven years, two months, and two days of total active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating that after a thorough review of the applicant’s limited official military personnel record, they were unable to verify his entitlement to award of the PUC or the VSM. The PUC is awarded to units of the United States Armed Forces for outstanding performance in action against an armed enemy occurring on, or after, 16 Oct 41, for U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps unit; and on or after 7 Dec 41; for U.S. Army and U.S. Air Force units. The VSM is awarded to members of the armed forces who, between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, served in Vietnam, its continuous waters, or airspace there-over; or Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia and the airspaces there-over, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam. To qualify, a service member must have actually participated as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations, or have served on temporary duty (TDY) for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days. There was no documentation in the applicant’s records indicating he served with a unit that was awarded the PUC or that indicated he had boots on the ground in the area of eligibility or otherwise qualified for award of the VSM. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Jan 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04193 in Executive Session on 23 May 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Sep 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, undated. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 13.