RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04606 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for spouse and child coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was miscounseled on SBP. He was told he had to pay a certain amount into SBP before his spouse could receive benefits. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former Regular Air Force member who retired on 1 Aug 10. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Prior to retirement, service members are provided in-depth information regarding the options and effects of SBP. On 31 Mar 10, the applicant and his spouse were counseled regarding SBP. The applicant declined to elect SBP and his spouse concurred with the election. By signing SBP Report on Individual Person (RIP), the applicant acknowledged and confirmed he understood the provisions of SBP. Although the applicant contends he was told he would have to pay a specific amount into SBP before his spouse would be entitled to the annuity payments, there is nothing in the SBP RIP that indicates such a restriction. Each service member voluntarily makes their SBP decision upon the level of risk they are willing to accept. It would be inappropriate to provide an additional opportunity to elect SBP coverage, an opportunity not afforded to other service members similarly situated. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Nov 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04606 in Executive Session on 31 Jul 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Sep 12. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 18 Oct 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Nov 12.