RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04637 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ He be awarded the following awards: 1. Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). 2. Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). 3. National Defense Service Medal (NDSM). 4. Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was awarded the PUC, AFOUA, NDSM, and SAEMR, but they are not reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________ ______________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Air Force on active duty in on 19 Sep 68. On 2 Jun 72, the applicant was honorably discharged and was credited with 3 years, 8 months, and 14 days of total active service, which included one year and two months of foreign service. The NDSM and SAEMR are already properly reflected on the applicant’s DD Form 214, dated 2 Jun 72. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant’s DD Form 214 currently reflects award of the NSDM and SAEMR; therefore, no update is required relative to these requests. The PUC is conferred on units of the armed forces of the United States and of cobelligerent nations for extraordinary heroism in action against an armed enemy on or after 7 Dec 41. The AFOUA is awarded by the Secretary of the Air Force to numbered units that have distinguished themselves by exceptionally meritorious service or outstanding achievement that clearly sets the unit above and apart from similar units. A review of the applicant’s records did not reveal any documentation confirming the applicant’s service with any units which received the PUC or AFOUA. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Jan 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04637 in Executive Session on 25 Jun 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, 3 Oct 12, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 28 Dec 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 13. Panel Chair