RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04765 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded all authorized medals, to include the following: a. Overseas Service Commemorative Medal. b. Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM). c. Air Force Commemorative Medal. d. Armed Forces Retired Service Commemorative Medal. e. NATO Service Commemorative Medal f. Republic of Vietnam Service Commemorative Medal. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is eligible for several medals that were authorized subsequent to his retirement. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 1 June 1989, the applicant retired from the Air Force and was credited with 20 years and 24 days of total active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A review of the applicant’s record revealed that his dates of service were from 7 May 1969 to 31 May 1989; therefore he is ineligible for award of the AFSM as it was authorized after 1 Jun 92 to recognize members of the Armed Forces who participated in a military operation deemed to be significant activity by the Joint Chiefs of Staff where no foreign armed opposition or imminent threat of hostile action was encountered. In regards to his request for the Overseas Service Commemorative Medal, United States Air Force Commemorative Medal, Armed Forces Retired Commemorative Medal, NATO Service Commemorative Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Defense Commemorative Medal, they are primarily celebratory display medals rather than official awards or decorations of the United States Air Force and Department of Defense. These commemorative medals may be obtained from commercial sources. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 December 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no response. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04765 in Executive Session on 18 July 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 October 2012. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 6 December 2012. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 December 2012.