RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04770 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 9 Sep 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Prior to the 9 Sep 12 FA, he received a valid waiver from his physical training leader (PTL) exempting him from the walking portion of his FA; however, the person who administered the FA recorded the cardio portion of the FA as “incomplete,” causing him to fail. This may have been done on purpose due to a personality conflict he had with the FA administrator. The unsatisfactory FA score caused his reenlistment and promotion to be stopped. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant served in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) during the matter under review. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 9 Sep 12 37.50 Unsatisfactory 10 Sep 11 96.20 Excellent 12 Mar 11 87.80 Satisfactory 18 Sep 10 89.50 Satisfactory 13 Mar 10 79.55 Good The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error of injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Air Force Guidance Memo 4, Fitness Program, the Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) retains the Fitness Screening Questionnaire (FSQ) and/or the AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, and the AF Form 422, Physical Profile Serial Report, in a folder until a more current FSQ is signed or the AF Form 469 expires. The UFPM notifies the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) of all exemptions. The FAC enters exemptions into the AFFMS. The applicant did not provide documented evidence that he received a waiver. Therefore, this office cannot determine the existence of an injustice. On 6 Nov 12, additional documentation was requested from the applicant, but none was received. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Feb 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of AFPC/DPSIM and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04770 in Executive Session on 9 Jul 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Oct 12. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 2 Feb 13, w/atch. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 13.