RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05265 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 19 Jul 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He experienced symptoms of nausea and vomiting for three weeks; as a result of this medical condition, he was unable to attain a passing score on the waist measurement component of the contested FA. By the time he sought medical care, the problem had rectified itself. In support of his request, the applicant provides an expanded statement and a copy of SF Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness, Body Composition, and Muscular Fitness. Military members receive a composite score on a 0 to 100 scale based on the following maximum component scores: 60 points for aerobic, 20 points for body composition, 10 points for push-ups and 10 points for sit-ups. Furthermore, Attachment 2, USAF Fitness Scoring, of the AFI reflects males 30-39 must meet minimum value in each of the four components, and achieve a composite point total greater than 75 points. The passing minimum score for the waist measurement component is 39 inches. On 19 Jul 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA where his waist was measured at 41 inches; as a result, he did not attain a satisfactory score on the overall assessment. On 23 Jul 12, the applicant reported to the Family Practice Clinic with complaints of nausea and constipation on and off for two weeks. The applicant stated he had a long history a high protein, low carbohydrate, and fiber diet. The applicant was counseled on proper nutrition. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Abdominal Circumference Composite Score Rating 5 Nov 12 40.50 66.11 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 41.00 77.50 Unsatisfactory 26 Jan 12 39:00 84.10 Satisfactory 26 Jul 11 38.50 86.20 Satisfactory 26 May 11 39.50 86.00 Unsatisfactory On 3 Dec 12, AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant provide additional documentation to substantiate his claim, specifically a signed copies of his fitness score sheet and questionnaire. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error an injustice. The applicant chose to complete the FA despite his medical condition. Prior to his FA, he should have reported his medical concerns to the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC). Had he notified the FAC of his condition, the FAC would have excused him from testing. Under the governing instruction if an airman becomes ill or injured during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, the service member has the option of being evaluated by the Military Treatment Facility (MTF); however, the member’s test would still count, unless the Unit Commander renders the test invalid. The instruction also indicates that it is the responsibility of the service member to maintain year-round physical fitness through self-directed and unit-based fitness programs and proper nutrition standards; however, the record reflects the purported medical condition was attributed to the applicant’s nutritional choices. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ ? APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jun 13 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05265 in Executive Session on 29 Aug 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member ? The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05265 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Oct 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Military Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AF/DPSIM, dated 7 Jun 13, w/atchs. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jun 13.