RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05454 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He does not believe his discharge should be less than an honorable for his entire life. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 Sep 82. On 9 Aug 85, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for drug abuse. The reason for the action was the applicant tested positive for marijuana on a random urinalysis. On 26 Aug 85, the case was found to be legally sufficient and on 6 Sep 85, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnished a general discharge, without probation and rehabilitation. On 23 Sep 85, the applicant was furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge and was credited with 3 years and 22 days of total active service. On 15 Aug 13, a request for post-service information was forwarded to applicant for comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge process. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for drug abuse was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander’s discretionary authority. He has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of his service was improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing directive. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge on the basis of clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence relating to his post-service accomplishments, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicant’s General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05454 in Executive Session on 19 Sep 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05454 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Nov 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Aug 12, w/atch. Panel Chair