RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05892 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Re-entry (RE) code of “2X” (1st Term, 2nd Term or Career AMN Not Selected under Selection Retention Process (SRP)) be changed to “1J” (Eligible To Reenlist-Elected Separation Or Discharge. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His commander stated that he failed to keep his mobility requirement up to date because his passport expired. There were 24 other passports within the section that had the same problem but he was singled out and denied reenlistment. In support of his request, the applicant provided copies of Copy 1 and 4 of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his memorandum in response to denial of reenlistment, several letters of character statements, an AMC Form 196, Aircraft Commander’s Report on Crew Member, and his AF Form 910s, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru TSgt) dated 16 Jan 2008 thru 15 Jan 2009, and 16 Jan 2009 thru 28 May 2009. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 July 2002 and was released on 30 June 2010 with an honorable characterization of service and was credited with 7 years, 11 months, and 29 days of active duty service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant had a history of disciplinary infractions and did not provide any proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code. The applicant's supervisor non-recommended him on an AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, on 23 March 2010, and his commander non-selected him on 23 March 2010 citing three letters of reprimand. In addition to the three disciplinary infractions the applicant received an Article 15 for getting cash with his government charge card for non-government uses on his previous enlistment. The applicant acknowledged his non- selection on 23 March 2010. He appealed the decision on 26 March 2010. The appeal was denied on 11 June 2010 and the applicant acknowledged the denial on 15 June 2010. The applicant was released from active duty on 30 June 2010 under the fiscal year (FY) 2010 AF Force Shaping Rollback Program with $10,895.55 in separation pay. 2. AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or nonselection authority. The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the member’s enlisted performance report (EPR) ratings, unfavorable information from any substantiated source, the airman's willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the airman's ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty performance levels. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 February 2013 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has not been received. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 17 October 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05892: Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated 12 Dec 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 11 Feb 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 2013. Panel Chair