RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05899 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his children. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Post 9/11 GI Bill was effective in 2009; however, he just recently became aware of the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB). The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 31 Oct 06, the applicant was relieved from active duty, with a reason for separation of voluntary retirement: sufficient service for retirement. On 1 Nov 06, he retired after serving 24 years and 4 days on active duty. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, noting the applicant retired 1 Nov 06. The program for the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) started 1 Aug 09. Since 38 USC, Chapter 33, Section 3319 (f) (1) states "an individual... may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed," he is not eligible for the TEB. The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant notes that the advisory opinion recommends denial even though he did not receive adequate counseling as required by law and Department of Defense (DoD). He feels this is a grave "blanket" injustice and that each case should be decided on a case by case basis. Even though the benefit was advertised by various methods, he still was not aware of it. He served honorably for 24 years and asks the Board to allow him to transfer his Post 911 GI Bill benefits to his children. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The applicant argues that had he did not receive adequate counseling as required by law and the DoD; however, we are not convinced the applicant is the victim of an error or injustice, or that he has been treated differently than others similarly situated. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05899 in Executive Session on 24 Sep 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Dec 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 2 Jan 13. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Jan 13. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 Feb 13. Panel Chair 2