RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00039

COUNSEL:  NONE
HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Dec 2012, be removed from 
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS)
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Due to an administrative error, the correct duty restrictions 
were not included on the AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition 
Report.  Therefore, he was required to test on all components.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of AF 
Forms 469.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force.  Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in 
this Record of Proceedings.

________________________________________________________________

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval.  DPSIM states that the 
applicant’s AF Form 469 dated 11 May 2012, signed the same day 
as the FA in question, exempted him from the cardio component of 
the FA.  While he was exempt from the cardio component of the 
FA, his AF Form 469 did not restrict the other components.  
Therefore, there is no authority to remove them from the AFFMS.  
Consequently, they recommend the cardio component of the FA 
dated 27 Dec 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS.  The 
overall composite score will change to reflect 
89.50 (Satisfactory).

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit 
B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 19 Sep 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
C).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant 
removing the entire contested FA.  In this respect, we note the 
applicant has not provided substantial evidence to invalidate 
the results of the entire FA.  Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence the entire FA is in error or unjust, we find no basis 
upon which to recommend favorable consideration of his request 
to void the contested FA in its entirety.

4.  Notwithstanding the above, sufficient relevant evidence has 
been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or 
injustice to warrant partial relief.  In this respect, we note 
the medical clinic confirmed the AF Form 469 should have 
included a running restriction. In view of this and in the 
interest of justice, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has been the victim of either an 
error or an injustice.  Accordingly, we recommend the 
applicant’s records be corrected to the extent set forth below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio 
component of his FA dated 27 Dec 2012, reflect "exempt" in the 
AFFMS.

________________________________________________________________



The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 29 Oct 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket number 
BC-2013-00039 was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Dec 2012, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 23 Aug 2013, w/atchs.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 2013.
1 2