RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:				DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00797
      COUNSEL: NONE
	                 				HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

1. Her Retention/Retirement (R/R) Anniversary Date be changed 
from 29 October 1979 to 21 September 1979 to allow two Inactive 
Duty Training (IDT) participation points to be moved from her 
anniversary year ending (AYE) 29 October 1979 to her AYE 
29 October 1980.  

2. She be credited with her Navy Reserve participation points 
accrued in AYE 28 October 1981.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

This transfer of points will allow her a total of 50 points for 
AYE 29 October 1980 and a satisfactory year of service towards 
retirement.  Her anniversary date should coincide with her 
reenlistment date.

In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of her 
Air National Guard/United States Air Force Reserve (ANG/USAFR) 
Point Credit Summary, Report on Individual Personnel, and 
Statement of Service for Naval Reserve Retirement.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

ARPC/DPTS recommends denial.  DPTS states the requested remedy 
is contrary to Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 
12732.  The applicant served continuously from the time she 
entered active status after a civilian break-in-service on 
29 October 1975 through her 20 September 1981 discharge.  The 
first day in active status set the applicant’s 29 October 
anniversary date.  Moreover, her 21 September 1979 reenlistment 
did not lead to or stem from a break-in-service, and 
consequently did not affect her anniversary date.  Once set, the 
anniversary date would not change unless the Reserve member 
changed components, transitioned from inactive to active status 
or returned to active status from a civilian break-in-service.  
The applicant’s points and years of satisfactory service are 
correctly reflected in her ANG/USAFR Point Credit Summary.  

In regard to the applicant’s request concerning her Navy Reserve 
participation points, they recommend she petition the United 
States Navy.  

The complete DPTS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 1 April 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00797 in Executive Session on 14 November 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	                   , Panel Chair
	                   , Member
	                   , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00797:

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Jan 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPTS, dated 21 Mar 13.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Apr 13.
1 2