RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02354 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM). ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is entitled to the contested award due to deployments to Saudi Arabia in support of Desert Wind, Desert Fox and a deployment to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of his appeal. The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 15 March 2007, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Service) in the grade of staff sergeant. He served 12 years, 9 months and 1 day on active duty and was credited with 4 years and 21 days of foreign service. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the SWASM. DPSID states the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) verified the applicant received Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay for deployments to Saudi Arabia from 21 February 1998 to 20 April 1998 and again from 4 November 1999 to 4 December 1999. The applicant’s Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ending 14 February 1999 indicated the applicant served in support of Operation SOUTHERN WATCH. This EPR includes both of the deployments to Saudi Arabia as verified by DFAS. Therefore, the applicant meets the criteria for the AFEM for his direct support of Operation SOUTHERN WATCH, for both deployments. However, IAW DoDM 1348.33 volume 2, subsequent deployments to the same operation do not qualify for an addition to the AFEM. AF Force Form 104, Service Medal Award Verification, in the applicant’s records indicates he was awarded the Afghanistan Campaign Medal and the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with Gold Border while deployed with the 455th Expeditionary Aircraft Maintenance Squadron, Bagram, Afghanistan, in direct support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel records, they were able to verify award of the AFEM and the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with Gold Border. They were unable to locate official documentation in the applicant’s official military personnel record verifying the applicant was in the area of eligibility for Operations DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM prior to the end of the eligibility period on 30 November 1995; therefore, rendering the applicant ineligible for award of the SWASM. Based on their review of the applicant’s records, they were able to determine the Air Force Good Conduct Medal with two Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters, AFEM, Afghanistan Campaign Medal with one Bronze Service Star, and Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with Gold Border – should have been awarded during the applicant’s service from 15 June 1994 and 15 March 2007 and were not reflected in his records. Upon final board decision, administrative correction of the applicant’s official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 5 August 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendations of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to substantiate his entitlement to the SWASM. Therefore, other than the administrative correction cited above, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02354 in Executive Session on 6 February 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 May 2013. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Available Master Personnel Record. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 1 July 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 August 2013. 2 3 4