RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03050 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her AF Form 899, Request And Authorization For Permanent Change Of Station-Military (PCS orders), dated 10 May 13, be changed to authorize early dependent travel for her daughter, so she can file a travel voucher and be reimbursed for the cost of her daughter’s airfare to her new duty station. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR); due to her medical profile’s lifting restrictions, she should be able to file a travel voucher for her daughter’s airfare to her new duty station. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant currently serves in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman first class (E-3). According to the AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 5 Nov 12, submitted by the applicant, she was on a medical profile with lifting restrictions. The applicant received PCS orders dated 10 May 13 authorizing her PCS from Randolph AFB, TX, to Ellsworth AFB, SD with a report no later than date of 30 Jun 13 (Exhibit B). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A1PP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In accordance with JFTR, U5201, B2b, a member is not authorized dependent travel and transportation allowances when a dependent travels at personal expense before a PCS order is issued or before receiving official notice that such an order was to be issued. Based on the limited information presented by the applicant, there is no basis to change her current PCS orders. A complete copy of the AF/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 12 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03050 in Executive Session on 19 Jun 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 Jun 13, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant’s AF Form 899 (PCS orders). Exhibit C.  Letter, AF/A1PP, dated 23 Apr 14. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 May 14. 1 2