RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-03510
		
			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Narrative Reason for Separation, as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect “Hardship” rather than “Entry Level 
Performance and Conduct.”
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His separation was based on hardship.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________ ______________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 28 Oct 85, the applicant commenced his enlistment in the Regular Air Force.

On 7 Mar 86, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for failure to make satisfactory progress in 
a required training program (Jet Engine Mechanic Course).  The specific reason for the discharge action was on 20 Feb 86, the applicant failed Block II, 
Jet Engine Repair Test, with a score of 58 percent; and on 27 Feb 86, he failed the Block II retest with a score 60 percent.  The required passing minimum 
score was 70 percent.  He was academically eliminated from training on 4 Mar 86.  While the applicant’s academic ability was average, the instructor 
believed the applicant lacked confidence and his attitude towards the course was indifferent.

On 7 Mar 86, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the 
notification and, after consulting with legal counsel, waived 
his right to submit a statement in his own behalf.

On 11 Mar 86, the discharge authority directed discharge with an 
entry level separation for performance and conduct.  The 
applicant was credited with 4 months and 15 days of total active 
service.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred during the discharge process.  Based on the available evidence of 
record, it appears the applicant’s entry-level separation for failure to progress satisfactorily in required training was consistent with the substantive 
requirements of the governing instructions and within the commander’s discretionary authority.  He has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe 
his entry-level separation with uncharacterized service was improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing directive, or the narrative reason for 
separation issued in conjunction with his entry-level separation was erroneous or inappropriately assigned.  Therefore, absent evidence the applicant was 
not afforded rights to which he was entitled, there was an abuse of discretionary authority, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the requested relief.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a 
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03510 in Executive Session on 20 May 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 Jul 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
1 2