RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05123 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The “Station Where Separated” reflected in Block 8b of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated 12 Aug 13, be changed to read “Travis AFB, CA.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 currently reflects “JBSA Randolph AFB, TX” in Block 8b, but he served his full term and separated from Travis AFB, CA. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 11 Aug 09. On 10 Aug 13, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge and credited with four years of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, Table 4, Rule 1 directs that “Station Where Separated” reflect the “location of facility where separation documents were prepared.” The applicant’s separation documents were prepared at JBSA Randolph AFB, TX. The DD Form 214 is designed by the Department of Defense for consistent application of use between the respective military branches of service. The applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct. The data in question is accurately reflected in accordance with governing directives. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05123 in Executive Session on 14 Oct 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Oct 13, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 28 Feb 14. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 14. 2 3