RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05478
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second term or career 
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the 
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be upgraded to allow his 
reenlistment in the military.

________________________________________________________________

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served on active duty for 12 years.  During this time his 
performance was excellent except a short period between 2010 and 
2011.  He was going through a very difficult divorce.  He 
received disciplinary action during this period; primarily, 
relating to issues surrounding his divorce.  His last 
disciplinary action was, on 5 Dec 11 and it was his 
understanding that it would be purged after six months. 

He was separated in Dec 12 as a result of being denied 
reenlistment.  He believes his record should have been 
completely cleared by his discharge date.

The applicant provides no rationale as to why his failure to 
timely file should be waived in the interest of justice.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 18 Jul 00, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.  
On 1 Feb 05, the applicant was promoted to the grade of Staff 
Sergeant (SSgt).

On 26 Sep 12, the applicant was not selected for reenlistment.  
His commander listed two Letters of Counseling (LOCs); three 
Memoranda for Record (MFRs); and four Letters of Reprimand 
(LORs) for poor work ethics, failure to report, failing to pay 
debt, unprofessional acts, and unauthorized use of government of 
travel card as the reasons for his decision.

On 8 Dec 12, the applicant was released from active duty with a 
reason for separation of completion of required active service 
and a RE code of 2X.  He was credited with 12 years, 4 months, 
and 21 days of active duty service.

________________________________________________________________

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  

DPSOA notes that In accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2606, 
Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective 
reenlistment selection or non-selection authority.  The 
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the members 
Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable 
Information from any substantiated source, the airman's 
willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the 
airman's ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty 
performance levels.  The applicant contends all his disciplinary 
actions should have been purged after six months; however, he 
received three MFRs, two LOCs, and four LORs for disciplinary 
actions during his last reenlistment period and commanders 
should consider all infractions that occurred on the current 
reenlistment when determining reenlistment eligibility.

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 18 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After careful 
consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence 
of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice 
to warrant corrective action.  The facts and opinion stated by 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility appear to be 
based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately 
rebutted by the applicant.  Absent convincing evidence the 
applicant has been denied rights to which entitled, appropriate 
directives were not followed, or appropriate standards were not 
applied, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-05478 in Executive Session on 18 Sep 14, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 Nov 13, w/atch. 
    Exhibit B.  Pertinent Excerpts from Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jan 14.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Feb 14.





										Panel Chair