RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05515 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect five years and five months rather than four years and eight months. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her original DD Form 214 states that she served during the period 24 Oct 75 through 26 Jun 80, which is equivalent to five years and six months. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 24 Oct 75. On 23 Jun 80, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with four years and eight months of total active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The amount of service credit reflected on the applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct. The applicant entered the service on 24 Oct 75 and was discharged on 23 Jun 80, which is a period of four years and eight months. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05515 in Executive Session on 4 Nov 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Nov 13, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 13 Jan 14. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jul 14.