RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05672 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Force of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, Item 30, Remarks, be amended to reflect: a. Indochina-Yes (Administratively Corrected) b. Vietnam-No C. Korea-No. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His records should be corrected because he served in Korea, Vietnam and Indochina. The applicant provides no rationale as to why his failure to timely file should be waived in the interest of justice. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and AF Form 626, Request and Authorization for Temporary Duty - Military, which reflects his Temporary Duty (TDY) assignment to Kwang-Ju Air Base, Korea. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant served in the Regular Air Force from 5 November 1968 to 21 August 1972. He served 1 year, 4 months and 5 days of Foreign and/or Sea Service. In a letter to the applicant dated 4 February 2014, AFPC/DPAPP advised the applicant that the amount of Foreign Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 is correct. The letter also stated that specific locations are not annotated on a member's DD Form 214. As such, he was advised to use the letter as proof of "boots on ground" for Thailand, Okinawa and the Republic of Korea. THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s requests to amend his DD Form 214 to reflect Foreign Service in Vietnam and Korea. DPAPP verified the applicant was permanently assigned to Thailand and Okinawa so his DD Form 214, block 30 will be amended to reflect “Indochina-Yes.” Contrarily, the applicant was not permanently assigned to Korea, but rather assigned in a TDY status. Therefore, this location would not be annotated on his DD Form 214. Notwithstanding the above, DPAPP is unable to verify Foreign Service boots on the ground in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 28 February 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD: After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, Correction of Military Records and AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records. Furthermore, the applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the merits. Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to file in a timely manner. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely. The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 21 October 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2013-05672 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 December 2013, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 4 February 2014. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 February 2014.