RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00490 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code “6H” (Pending Discharge – Involuntary) be changed to a code which will allow reentry into the Air National Guard. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His current RE code was based on the fact he did not have a valid Security Clearance; which caused him to not be world-wide deployable. In support of his request, he submits Special Order P-002926, dated 18 Dec 13, and NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service. He highlights block #17 and #26, which states he has a “Secret” clearance dated 29 Aug 13. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant entered the Air National Guard on 29 Sep 04. On 26 Aug 13, the applicant was furnished a Honorable discharge, and was credited with 8 years, 10 months, and 28 days. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant was unable to secure a security clearance. His commander allowed him to obtain the necessary clearance; however, his clearance was denied by the Air Force Central Adjudicating Facility (AFCAF). Based on that fact, the unit began administrative actions to separate him and he was involuntarily discharged. The NGB finds his RE code appropriate. However, NGB/A1PP recommends if the member has resolved the issue regarding his security clearance, he should contact a recruiter and request a waiver to his RE code to reenlist in the military. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00490 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jan 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, NGB/A1PP, dated 21 Mar 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Sep 14.