RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00636 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Uncharacterized discharge be changed to reflect General (Under Honorable Conditions). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His characterization of discharge is unjust. After failing an exam for the second time and failing to progress in training, he elected to separate rather than be reclassified into the security forces career field. He feels his discharge should be classified as General (Under Honorable Conditions) rather than Uncharacterized. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 6 Jun 06. On 18 Sep 06, the applicant was disenrolled from Ground Radio Communications Apprentice Course for failing Block II test twice with scores of 67% and 57% respectively (minimum passing score 70%). On 11 Oct 06, the applicant was notified by his commander of her intent to recommend discharge under the provisions of AFI 36- 3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen (Entry Level Performance and Conduct; failure to make satisfactory progress in a required training program), with an Uncharacterized discharge. The discharge authority approved the separation and directed the applicant be separated with an Entry-level (Uncharacterized) discharge. On 25 Oct 06, the applicant was furnished an Uncharacterized discharge, and was credited with 4 months, and 20 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Airman are given Entry-level separation/Uncharacterized service characterization when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service. The Department of Defense determined if member served less than 180 days continuous active service, it would be unfair to the member and the service to characterize their limited service. Therefore, the character of service on his DD form 214 is correct and in accordance with DoD and Air Force instructions. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Mar 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been a victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00636 in Executive Session on 21 Nov 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Feb 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Excerpt of Applicant's Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 26 Feb 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Mar 14.