RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00685 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge be upgraded to Honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His discharge after 55 months of service was inequitable as the decision was based on one isolated incident, which occurred after completing temporary duty in Thailand. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 28 Nov 90. Between 4 Jan 95 and 6 Jun 95, the applicant received four Article 15s, Nonjudicial Punishment; which consisted of two instances of drug abuse, one instance of violating base restriction and one instance of failing to pay just debts. Punishment consisted of extra duty, base restriction, forfeiture of pay, and demotion to airman basic. On 14 Jun 95, the applicant’s commander initiated discharge proceedings with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions pursuant to AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, Section H, paragraph 5.54 and 5.50.2 for misconduct based on drug abuse and pattern of misconduct. The same day, the applicant acknowledged notification and on 19 Jun 95 submitted an unconditional waiver of his rights associated with an administrative discharge board. On 10 Jul 95, the applicant was furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge, and was credited with 4 years, 7 months, and 13 days of active service. A request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Apr 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the applicant’s post-service activities, there is no way for us to determine if the applicant’s accomplishments since leaving the service are sufficiently meritorious to overcome the misconduct for which he was discharged. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00685 in Executive Session on 21 Nov 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Feb 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Information Bulletin - Clemency.