RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00763 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2X” (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) be changed so she may reenter the military. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She has never been in trouble, or received any non-judicial punishment that would prevent her from joining the military at another point in her life. She did not realize her current RE code does not allow her to rejoin the military until about six months ago or she would have addressed the issue sooner. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 05 Sep 06, the applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force. On 1 Apr 10, the applicant’s supervisor recommended the applicant not be recommended for re-enlistment due to marginal performance as evidence be her receiving a referral enlisted performance report, and multiple disciplinary actions, as evidenced by her receipt of an unfavorable information file (UIF), with two letters of reprimand. The applicant’s commander non-selected the applicant for re-enlistment the same day. On 9 Apr 10, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action and her right to appeal the decision within ten calendar days. On 30 Jun 10, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge with an RE code of 2X, and was credited with 3 years, 9 months, and 26 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the members Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable Information from any substantiated source, the airman's willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the airman's ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty performance levels. The applicant had a history of unsatisfactory performance and the commander acted within his authority under the governing instruction. Further, the applicant did not appeal the commander’s decision rendered. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we believe that given the circumstances surrounding her separation from the Air Force, the RE code assigned was proper and in compliance with the appropriate instructions. In addition, the applicant has not provided any evidence which would lead us to believe that a change to her RE code to allow her to reenlist is warranted. Therefore, we agree with the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00763 in Executive Session on 17 Dec 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Dec 13. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 Apr 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 14.