RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00768 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he did not lose six days of leave when he retired, but that he was able to sell said leave. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not made aware that he would lose the leave in question in conjunction with his retirement. He was directed by his commander support staff to go on permissive temporary duty (PTDY) and terminal leave by the 28th of September 2013. He did not sign an Air Force Form 988, Leave Request/Authorization, agreeing to the computations. If he had known he would be losing six days of leave then he would have made adjustments to his PTDY and terminal leave dates. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant served in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Master Sergeant (E-7) during the matter under review. On 11 Jun 13, according to documentation provided by the applicant, a member of his commander support staff indicated in an email that his leave and permissive TDY should “line up as follows:” 20 days of permissive temporary duty for house hunting from 15 Sep 13 through 4 Oct 13 and 88 days of terminal leave 5 Oct 13 through 31 Dec 13. On 1 Oct 13, the applicant lost six days of leave as he had a leave balance in excess of 75 days when he crossed into the new fiscal year. On 31 Dec 13, the applicant was relieved from active duty and retired, effective 1 Jan 14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s master military pay account (MMPA) reflects that the applicant used 21 days of leave during FY13 (ending 30 Sep 13). At the end of FY13, the applicant had a leave balance of 81 days. However, he lost six days of leave since he was over the 75 day maximum balance that he could carry forward into FY14 (1 Oct 13 – 31 Dec 13). He earned seven days of leave during FY14 and used 83 days. Leave is governed in accordance with AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program. Member’s failure to use leave can result in loss of accrued leave at Fiscal Year (FY) end leave balancing or upon retirement or separation from active duty. The applicant did not use six days of his annual/ordinary leave prior to retiring; therefore, he forfeited those six days of leave. It is the responsibility of management and the member to monitor his leave balance and scheduling with management in order to prevent lost leave. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; to include the correspondence the applicant provided from his Customer Support Staff regarding his leave and permissive duty dates. However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. While the applicant has provided a copy of email traffic wherein his commander support staff representative indicated that his leave should “line up” so that he would be able to take 88 days of accrued leave as terminal leave prior to his retirement, we are not convinced that this traffic, in and of itself, should form the basis of a recommendation to grant relief. In this respect, we note that in the months leading up to the end of the fiscal year, his leave and earning statements would have clearly indicated that he was going to lose leave at the end of the fiscal year and we do not find it reasonable to conclude that someone of his rank and tenure would not understand the implications of carrying more than the maximum amount of leave allowable into the end of a fiscal year. It is ultimately the responsibility of all Air Force members to monitor their leave given the well-known policy regarding the maximum allowable leave balance that can be carried into a new fiscal year. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00768 in Executive Session on 22 Jan 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Feb 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 6 Jun 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 14.