RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00844 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His extension be cancelled to allow him to reenlist and receive a Zone-A selective reenlistment bonus. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he returned from his deployment, he was selected for a base of preference (BOP) permanent change of assignment to Lackland. He tried to reenlist during his first month back to get the reenlistment bonus; however, he was told that he could not reenlist for four years due to his high year tenure. Since he was testing for staff sergeant out of cycle, the reenlistment section advised him to wait for the test results and then reenlist for four years. Later, the same individual contacted him and said the Air Force Personnel Center found a work-around allowing him to extend and once he arrived at his gaining base, he could cancel the extension and reenlist – if he were selected for staff sergeant. Under that advisement, he extended on 10 October 2013. On 17 October 2013, he was selected for promotion to staff sergeant. Once he arrived at the new base, he was told the information he received was false and that he would not receive a bonus. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is active duty serving in the grade of staff sergeant. On 16 September 2013, he extended his enlistment for 20 months for assignment retainability. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends approval. The applicant received a BOP assignment in the summer of 2013 for which, he was required to reenlist within 30 days of being notified in order to keep the assignment. Reenlistment is a requirement for first term airmen to accept and keep a BOP assignment. Because of the applicant’s 6 year initial enlistment and his 8 year high year tenure for his grade of senior airman, he was only eligible to reenlist for 2 years and the number of months of obligated service left from his initial enlistment. The applicant did not want to reenlist at that time because a 2 year reenlistment would not entitle him to a zone A SRB; to be eligible for the SRB the member has to reenlist or extend for a minimum of 36 months. The applicant was not only allowed to wait until 16 September 2013 to get the retainability (well past the 30 day requirement), but he was allowed to extend instead of reenlist which is not authorized for first term airman BOP. The applicant should have been advised to apply for a retainability suspense delay until 17 October 2013, as an exception to policy under AFI 36-2110, Assignments, paragraph 1.5. Under the retainability delay rules, members must get the required retainability on the first day eligible. This delay would have allowed him to see if he was selected for promotion. If selected, his high year tenure would have been adjusted and he would have been eligible to apply for another retainability suspense delay per table 2.7 rule 1. Delays under this rule are approved locally through the military personnel section commander and are normally approved. The second retainability suspense delay would have allowed the applicant to reenlist for four years and allowed him to be paid the reenlistment bonus as a staff sergeant since his promotion was effective 1 November 2013. The Board may direct the applicants 16 September 2013 extension for PCS be voided and his record be corrected to reflect a 4 year and 24 month reenlistment effective 2 November 2013 with entitlement to a zone A multiple 7.0 SRB for 4 years of continued service. A copy of the complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 September 2014 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief should be granted. The evidence of record shows the applicant was miscounseled regarding his reenlistment/extension options. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a. The extension of his 1 April 2008 enlistment executed on 16 September 2013 for a period of 20 months be declared void. b. He was honorably discharged on 1 November 2013 and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 November 2013 for a period of 4 years and 24 months with entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus for Zone A, Multiple 7.0 payable for 4 years of continued service. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00844 in Executive Session on 8 January 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00844 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Feb 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 10 Apr 14. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 14.