RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00864 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, Block 13a, Character of Service, be corrected to reflect “Medical Discharge”. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He joined the Air Force on a medical waiver, for asthma and his condition worsened while on active duty. Upon discharge, he was only afforded an “Honorable” discharge without any indication or notification of his worsened medical condition. In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 18 Sep 72. On 8 Nov 72, the applicant was recommended for discharge in accordance with AFM 39-10, Separation Upon Expiration of Term of Service, for Convenience of Government, Minority, Dependency and Hardship, Chapter 3, paragraph 3-8q based on unacceptable for military service. On the same date, the applicant acknowledged this action and annotated that he did not desire to make a statement or submit a rebuttal. He also did not desire to have the case evaluated by a field grade officer. On 9 Nov 72, the discharge authority approved discharge. On 14 Nov 72, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge, and was credited with 1 month, and 27 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not presented evidence to indicate that the medical condition for which he was reportedly waived to enter the military service was permanently aggravated above and beyond its expected natural progression, or clinical expression, during his brief period of military service. Due to the vast expanse of time and the total absence of medical evidence to the contrary, they find the applicant has not met the burden of proof. A complete copy of the BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. It has been 42 years since the applicant’s discharge from service and there is no explanation provided regarding the excessive delay in submitting an application within three years of discharge. Based on the documentation in the master personnel record, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation, SPD code and separation type was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 12 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD: After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely. Applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-2603. Applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the merits. Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to file in a timely manner. With respect to his request for his military personnel records, inasmuch as the Board is not the custodian for such records, it is suggested the applicant contact the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) to request copies of his records. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00864 in Executive Session on 10 Mar 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00864 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Jan 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 2 Oct 14. Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 10 Nov 14. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Jan 15.