ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-02956-3

	COUNSEL:  NONE
	
	HEARING:  YES

U
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The applicant requests that the Board reconsider her request for the following:  

	a.  Her AF Form 911, Enlisted Performance Report (MSgt thru CMSgt) rendered for the period 11 May 11 thru 10 May 12, Block 6, Leadership/Team Building/Followership/Mentorship be changed from Above Average to Clearly Exceeds.

	b.  She be given retroactive promotion consideration to the grade of Chief Master Sergeant (E-9).

RESUME OF THE CASE:

On 15 Jan 15, the Board considered and denied a request for correction of military records submitted by the applicant, finding that she had not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before the Board.  For an accounting of the applicant’s original request and the rationale of the earlier decision, see the AFBCMR Letter and Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E with Exhibits A-D.

On 26 Mar 15, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration.  She again contended comparable Senior Noncommissioned Officers (SNCOs) EPRs and witness statements showed blatant disparities in the markings on performance reports within her command.  On 18 Feb 16, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s reconsideration request.  The Board found there was no evidence to substantiate the applicant’s contentions.  For an accounting of the applicant’s request for and the rationale of the earlier decision, see the AFBCMR Letter and Record of Proceedings, at Exhibit F with Exhibits E-H.

By application dated 25 Jul 16, the applicant again requests reconsideration, indicating the previous ROP contained inaccurate information.  Specifically, the applicant contends the statement “the only other SNCO in her chain would not provide his EPR; however, he was promoted to the grade of senior master sergeant (E-8) the following year,” is incorrect as she provided three other SNCOs who were in the same chain of command, as she was.  The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit G.

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After reviewing all Exhibits, the Board remains unconvinced the evidence presented demonstrates an error or injustice and therefore finds no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.  Therefore, the Board recommends against correcting the applicant’s records.

The applicant has not shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel would materially add to the Board’s understanding of the issues involved.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The applicant be informed the evidence did not demonstrate material error or injustice, and the application will only be reconsidered upon receipt of relevant evidence not already considered by the Board.

The application was adjudicated without a personal appearance.

CERTIFICATION:

The following quorum of the Board, as defined in Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR), paragraph 1.5, considered Docket Number BC-2012-02956-3 in Executive Session on 25 Oct 18:

		, Panel Chair
		, Panel Member
		, Panel Member

All members voted not to correct the record.  The panel considered the following:

Exhibit E:	Record of Proceedings, w/ Exhibits A-D, dated 15 Jan 15.
Exhibit F	Addendum Record of Proceedings w/Exhibits E-H, dated 26 Mar 15.
Exhibit G:	Application, DD Form 149, w/atchs, dated 26 Jul 16.

Taken together with all Exhibits, this document constitutes the true and complete Record of Proceedings required by AFI 36-2603, paragraph 4.11.9.