RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01035 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his deployments. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His deployments should be included on his DD Form 214. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant’s DD Form 214, on 1 Sep 89, he enlisted in the Regular Air Force. According to Special Order TE-0212, dated 14 Jan 03, the applicant was scheduled to deploy to Kuwait for 91 days. According to Special Order TE-0459, dated 18 May 09, he was scheduled to deploy to Guam for 131 days. On 1 Oct 13, he retired from active duty and was credited with 24 years, and 1 month of total active service. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, does not allow deployment locations on a DD Form 214 unless in conjunction with an operation and recorded with the award of a subsequent expeditionary medal. The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01035 in Executive Session on 11 Feb 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01035 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 May 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 25 Jun 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 14. 3