RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01094 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official military record be amended to reflect his Home Of Record (HOR) be changed. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of enlistment, he was transitory and only lived in Hawaii for three months. He fully intended to return to live with his family in when his enlistment was complete. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 5 May 99, the applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force. According to the applicant’s DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/ Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, at the time of entry, his HOR was recorded as . The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The Joint Federal Travel Regulation identifies the HOR as the location identified by the individual upon entering the service, not a location where the individual is later assigned or a location selected for convenience; a correction must be fully justified. Domicile or legal residence may change, but the HOR will not. Only if a break in service exceeds one full day, may the member change the HOR. The DD Form 4, is the source document for HOR and place of entry. The applicant’s DD FM 4/1, dated , as well as subsequent enlistment documents, list as his HOR. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01094 in Executive Session on 17 Dec 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01094 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Mar 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 21 Mar 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 14, w/atchs.