RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01176 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2X” (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There is insufficient evidence to justify a 2X code. He believes this adverse code is erroneous and is impacting his ability to reenlist in another branch of the military. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 14 Mar 06, the applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force. On 26 Mar 13, the applicant’s commander notified him he was not selected for reenlistment via AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, under the FY13 Enlisted Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, for multiple physical fitness failures, which had previously resulted in an administrative demotion. The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification and declined his right to appeal the same day. On 31 May 13, the applicant was honorably discharged, issued an RE code of 2X and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of LGH (failure to meet minimum standards of service), a narrative reason for separation of “non-retention on active duty,” and was credited with 7 years, 2 months, and 17 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant's commander acted within his authority, in accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the Air Force, by considering unfavorable information when making a reenlistment recommendation. Specifically, as noted on AF Form 418, the applicant received an administrative demotion for multiple physical fitness failures. The applicant acknowledged his non-selection for reenlistment and rendered his intent not to appeal the decision. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we believe that given the circumstances surrounding his separation from the Air Force, the RE code assigned was proper and in compliance with the appropriate instructions. In addition, the applicant has not provided any evidence which would lead us to believe that a change to his RE code to allow him to reenlist is warranted. Therefore, we agree with the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01176 in Executive Session on 17 Dec 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Mar 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA dated 16 Apr 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 May 14.