RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01535 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a higher disability rating for his Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The disability rating he is currently assigned is too low. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 24 Jul 87. On 8 Sep 03, the applicant suffered significant injuries to his hands due to an explosion while working on an F-117A tailhook system at Holloman AFB, NM. On 21 May 04, the applicant’s injuries were determined to be in-the-line-of-duty (ILOD). On 29 Nov 07, an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the non-mental health (MH) conditions as unfitting, with a combined rating of 40 percent. The disability rating did not include any percentage for MH issues. The applicant did not appeal this decision. On 24 Jan 08, the applicant retired due to permanent disability with a 40 percent disability rating due to burns and lacerations to his hands, after 20 years and 6 months of active service. On 27 Aug 08, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) issued the applicant a rating decision granting him a ten percent disability for his service-connected PTSD. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Physical Disabilities Review Board (PDBR) Special Review Panel (SRB) recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has requested a review of the military disability evaluation of his mental health (MH) condition. In accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of Service members who were referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 Sep 01 and 30 Apr 12 and whose MH diagnoses were changed or eliminated during that process, the applicant’s case file was reviewed regarding diagnosis change, fitness determination, and rating of unfitting MH diagnoses in accordance with the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.129 and §4.130. In Jan 06, the applicant was correctly diagnosed as having PTSD for several years prior to entering the Disability Evaluation System (DES) process. The SRP’s charge with respect to the MH conditions that were determined to be not unfitting is to accomplish an assessment of the appropriateness of the fitness adjudication. The threshold for countering not-unfit determinations requires a preponderance of evidence. The diagnosis of PTSD was documented throughout the applicant’s medical history and the commander’s statement indicated the applicant was diagnosed with PTSD which prevented him from being able to work around munitions or explosives. All four annual EPRs written after his injury documented excellent to exceptional job performance in his physically limited capacity. There was no sufficient evidence to support a conclusion that a highly stressful MH event severe enough to bring about the Veteran’s release from active military service occurred, and the application of VASRD §4.129 is not appropriate in this case. The applicant’s PTSD condition was “not unfitting” and therefore could not be recommended for additional disability rating. Recommend there be no change of the applicant’s disability and separation determination. A complete copy of the PDBR SRB evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 Mar 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the PBDR SRB and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01535 in Executive Session on 14 May 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Jun 13, w/atch. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, PDBR SRP, dated 6 Mar 15. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Mar 15.