RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01538 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of KND, which denotes “Miscellaneous/General Reasons,” be changed. His Reentry (RE) code of 4H, which denotes serving suspended punishment to Article 15 be corrected. (Administratively corrected) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He never lost a stripe or got into trouble again while he was active duty. The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because he wants to join the Air Force Reserves. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 28 Apr 04, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. On 30 Jun 10, the applicant received an honorable discharge, and was credited with 6 years, 2 months and 4 days of active service. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Based on documentation in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the separation code, the narrative reason for separation and character of service was appropriately administered and within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant completed a voluntary separation application request using the Personnel Processing Application (PPA) on 19 Apr 10, where he requested early separation for “Miscellaneous reasons,” with an effective date of separation of 30 Jun 10. The applicant’s commander recommended approval on 19 Apr 10. The separation authority approved the request and established an effective date of separation for 30 Jun 10, using the authority AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, chapter 3, section 3B, paragraph 3.15. The applicant acknowledged receipt and began separation out-processing actions. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 13 Jun 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01538 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Mar 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 30 May 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jun 14.