RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01588 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The mailing address on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The mailing address on the DD Form 214 is incorrect and she fears if any documents are sent to the address listed, her identity may be stolen. The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider her untimely application to prevent her identity from being stolen. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 24 Feb 04, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. On 23 Jul 09, the applicant received an honorable discharge. She was credited with 5 years and 5 months of active service. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. The need for a correction is without merit as the document was accurate at the time of publication and the address has already served its purpose and is no longer used. The sole purpose of the addresses in block 19 was for mailing the DD Form 214. With the applicant already in possession of a DD Form 214, the need for an address (or correction) is void as the address has already served its purpose. Per governing directives, DD Form 214 corrections are limited to two legitimized errors before a new DD Form 214 is required. Unless other corrections are warranted/directed, the requested correction to block 19 would not be accomplished as it was correct at the time of publication, that the address is no longer used and that the address does not provide entitlements or benefits. In contrast, to correct the document has greater impact to the individual and the protection of DD Form 214 information; a correction would require the mailing of documents referencing the old address to several supporting veteran service agencies who must manually marry changes to existing DD Forms 214. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01588 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Apr 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 29 Apr 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 14.