RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01792 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect the following awards: 1. Global War on Terrorism-Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E). 2. Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) (Administratively resolved). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was deployed to Iraq from August 2008 to December 2008, rendering him eligible for the medals listed above. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 1 Feb 06, the applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force. On or about 21 Aug 08, based on travel orders provided by the applicant, he was ordered to proceed from his home station, to Iraq, and return to his home station, for a period of over 90 days. On 28 Apr 11, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge and was credited with 5 years, 2 months, and 28 days of active service, which included 1 year, 6 months, and 18 days of foreign service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the GWOT-E, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Initial award of the GWOT-E was limited to personnel deployed abroad to specific geographic areas of eligibility in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (Afghanistan) or Operation IRAQI FREEDOM. However, the creation of the Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM) and the Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) changed the eligibility requirements for some personnel. Personnel who qualify for a campaign medal (ACM or ICM) and the GWOT-E during the same deployment period of service shall be awarded either the campaign medal or the GWOT-E, but not both. After a review of the applicant’s personnel records and Defense Finance and Accounting Service records, the applicant’s deployment in question meets eligibility criteria for the ICM with one Bronze Service Star (ICM w/1BSS); therefore, to grant relief to award the GWOT-E would be contrary to the eligibility criteria established by DoDM 1348.33, the Secretary of the Air Force, Chief of Staff, and/or the War Department. Additionally, based on the documentation contained in the applicant’s record, he meets the eligibility criteria for the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with Gold Border (AFESR w/GB) and it was not reflected in his records. Upon final board decision, the applicant's official military personnel record will be administratively corrected to reflect the ICM w/1BSS and the AFESR w/GB. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting correction of the applicant’s records to reflect his entitlement to the GWOT-E. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of AFPC/DPSID and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. However, we note AFPC/DPSIDR has determined the applicant’s eligibility for the ICM in lieu of the GWOT-E. Additionally, the applicant has met the eligibility criteria for the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with Gold Border (AFESR w/GB) and his records will be administratively corrected. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting relief beyond that rendered administratively. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01792 in Executive Session on 28 Jan 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01792 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Apr 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 7 Jul 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Oct 14.