RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02043 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be corrected. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His parents moved, so his address needs to be corrected to Knoxville, TN. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 21 Sep 07, the applicant signed a DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, thereby enlisting in the Air Force. At that time, the applicant listed Keystone Heights, FL as his HOR. On 13 Nov 12 the applicant signed a new DD Form 4, thereby reenlisting in the Air Force. At that time, the applicant once again listed Keystone Heights, FL as his HOR. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The DD Form 4 is the source document for HOR and Place of Entry (POE). The Joint Federal Travel Regulation, Volume I, Appendix A, reads Home of Record is the place recorded as the individual’s home when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty. Additionally, it states the place recorded as the individual’s home when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commissioned, appointed, enlisted or inducted or ordered into the tour of active duty unless there is a break in service of more than one full day. Only if a break in service exceeds one full day may the member change the HOR. Any such correction must be fully justified and the home, as corrected, must be the member’s actual home upon entering the Service, and not a different place selected for the member’s convenience. Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) Enlisted Accessions Branch confirmed that the applicant initialed his DD Form 4/1 on 21 Sep 07 as well as subsequent enlistment documents listing Keystone Heights, FL as his HOR. The complete DPSIP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02043 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Apr 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIP, dated 17 Jun 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Oct 14.