RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02071 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded Vietnam Ribbon. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in hostile fire in Vietnam and should be awarded the Vietnam Ribbon. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 15 Jan 64 and received an honorable discharge on 12 Jan 68 after serving for 3 years, 11 months, and 28 days on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s implied request for the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM) indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The RVCM is awarded to service members who, between 1 Mar 61 and 28 mar 73, served for six months in South Vietnam, or served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months. Only members who meet the criteria established for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal of Vietnam Service Medal during said period are considered to have contributed direct support to the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces. While the applicant served in Vietnam from 13 Dec 66 through 11 Feb 67 for approximately 60 days, said service does not meet the criteria for award of the RVCM. However, a review of the applicant’s records indicates that he should have been entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star (VSM w/1BSS) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P) and his records will be corrected administratively. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting correction of the applicant’s records to reflect his entitlement to the RVCM. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice with respect to the RVCM. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicant’s eligibility for the VSM w/lBSS and RVNGC w/P and will correct his records administratively. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting relief beyond that rendered administratively. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02071 in Executive Session on 19 Feb 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02071 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 May 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 8 Aug 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Oct 14.