RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02290 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His narrative reason for separation and separation program designator (SPD) code of “JFX” which denotes “Personality Disorder” be changed. 2. His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His current reason for separation “Personality Disorder” is unjust as he had laudable service with no instances of misconduct. He does not currently have a personality disorder diagnosis. His reason for separation is preventing him from finding gainful employment. He has pursued his education and will be graduating with a Bachelor of Arts degree. He has no criminal record and is drug free. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 28 Nov 06, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. On 2 Jun 08, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend his discharge for Mental Disorders – personality disorder and conditions that interfere with military service, mental disorders – adjustment disorders. The specific reason for the action was that he was diagnosed by a psychiatrist as having an adjustment disorder with depressed mood as well as borderline personality disorder, which significantly impaired his ability to function effectively in the military environment. On 2 Jun 08, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action, consulted with legal counsel, and waived his right to submit statements on his own behalf. On 13 Jun 08, the action was found to be legally sufficient and the discharge authority concurred with the commander’s recommendation. On 23 Jun 08, the applicant received an honorable discharge, with a narrative reason for separation of “Personality Disorder” and an RE Code of “2C.” He was credited with 1 year, 6 months and 26 days of total active service. On 12 Jul 12, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) reviewed the applicant’s request to change the narrative reason and authority for his discharge and RE code. The Board concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change the SPD code, narrative reason for separation, and character of service. The applicant’s record shows that the commander received a report signed by both a Licensed Clinical Social Worker and Flight Staff Psychologist. The report stated that the applicant endorsed in June 2007 that he attempted to commit suicide by overdosing on over-the-counter medication and also reported self-inflicted injuries by cutting on his wrists. The applicant again endorsed in December 2007 that he cut on his wrist in response to relationship problems he was having at the time. It further states that the applicant had intermittently endorsed self-harmful behavior since then, especially when under stress. There had been minimal improvement in mood and behavior through individual therapy but he continued to report impulsivity and chronic passive suicidal ideation that was of concern. Finally, the report stated that although he was not imminently suicidal at that time, he would pose a continued risk due to his emotional instability and behavioral impulsivity. The level of dysfunction and potential liabilities warranted separation. Thus, the SPD code and narrative reason for separation were indicated as such in accordance with the discharge instruction. Both the commander and discharge authority determined that the applicant’s character of service warranted an honorable discharge. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating that the applicant has not provided any proof of an error or injustice related to his RE code. The applicant states his reason for separation is preventing him from finding gainful civilian employment, but seems to have requested a change of RE code as a side bar. The RE code “2C” is the correct RE code based on applicant’s involuntary discharge with honorable character of service. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. BCMR Clinical Mental Health Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his reason for separation and RE code. From a mental health perspective, the applicant was appropriately diagnosed and was tendered reasonable and competent treatment. His diagnosis of Personality Disorder and Adjustment Disorder are based on his mercurial [unpredictable] personality style and his inability to adapt to military life. The advisor opines these diagnoses are accurate and the applicant has provided no convincing evidence to the contrary. A complete copy of the BCMR Clinical Mental Health Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 18 Sep 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit F). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) and the AFBCMR Mental Health Consultant and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02290 in Executive Session on 5 Nov 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02290 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 May 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 13 Jun 14. Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 9 Jul 14. Exhibit E. Memorandum, AFBCMR, Mental Health Consultant, dated 16 Sep 15. Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Sep 15.