RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02382 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) in her assignment history and Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) covering 8 Jun 02 through 15 Mar 04 be changed from “34M1” to “34M3”. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She had eight years of experience in the career field therefore; she had already achieved the “34M3” or “qualified” level. In support of her request, she submits the Air Force Officer Classification Directory (AFOCD), paragraph 3.4 which states “For award of AFSC 38P3, a minimum of 24 months of experience is mandatory.” The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a Lieutenant Colonel currently serving in the Air Force Reserves on Active Guard Reserve tour. The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS indicates DAFSCs are based on a member’s position, not experience level in accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, paragraph 1.4.8 (Atch 1). The member has not provided evidence that the “position” itself for which she was assigned during the periods of the OPRs were in fact at the qualified level of 34M3. Furthermore, ARPC recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request to correct the DAFSC on her 2003 and 2004 OPRs stating she has not exhausted all administrative avenues. ARPC recommends the member obtain a copy of the Unit Manning Document (UMD) for that time period, showing that she occupied the 34M3 position. This will be used as the supporting documentation for the DAFSC change. ARPC further recommends that the applicant submit her request, along with the appropriate documentation to the Evaluation Reports Appeals Board (ERAB). Upon ERAB approval, the member will forward the updated OPRs to Career Enhancements via the virtual Personnel Center-Guard Reserve system with a request to update the Assignment History portion of this request. The applicant has not provided sufficient documentation concerning her position at the time. The complete ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A Copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Dec 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02382 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Jun 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, ARPC/DPST, dated 12 Sep 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Dec 14.