RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02958 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His birth date be changed from 22 Jul 50 to 23 Jul 50 on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His birthdate is incorrect due to recent corrections to his original birth certificate information. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 14 Aug 70, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. According to DD Form 4, Application for Enlistment—Armed Forces of the United States, his birthdate is recorded as 22 Jul 50. According to DD Form 398, Statement of Personal History, his birthdate is recorded as 22 Jul 50. On 9 Dec 74, his birthdate is recorded as 23 Jul 50 on his Standard Form 88, Report of Medical Examination. On 22 Dec 74, the applicant received an honorable discharge. He was credited with 4 years, 4 months and 9 days of active service. According to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his birthdate is recorded as 22 Jul 50. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIR recommends deny the applicant’s request to correct his birthdate. Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, Table A7.5, Correction of Date of Birth, Note 3 states “Do not correct records of former members unless evidence proves the date of birth used while serving with the Air Force was erroneously recorded.” A review of the applicant’s records revealed he enlisted, served and was discharged under the date of birth (DOB) “22 Jul 50.” As “22 Jul 50” was the DOB the applicant presented for enlistment and there was no change to his DOB during his enlistment, it does not appear to have been erroneously recorded. Accordingly, as the applicant has no continuing affiliation with the Air Force as a Reserve member or retiree, DPSIR is unable to amend his military record after the fact. The complete DPSIR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. 4. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02958 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Jul 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIR, dated 27 Aug 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Oct 14.