RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03319 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to reenter the Air National Guard (ANG). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The RE code of 6H (Entry level separation and conduct—lack of aptitude for military service) reflected on her NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, is the wrong RE code. During a very stressful period after high school, she was given a misdiagnosis and a prescription that was unnecessary, but very common. She was prescribed Prozac and unfortunately took it for a little over four months, but has not taken it since Jan 13. When she told the ANG about it, her dates to attend Basic Training and Tech School were cancelled, and she was told she could not attend Basic Training until a year had passed from the date she stopped taking Prozac. However, she was then given the RE code of “6H” in error, which now prevents her from entering the ANG at all. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially enlisted in the ANG on 8 Aug 12. On 7 Jun 13, the applicant was furnished an entry level separation (ELS), with an RE code of “6H,” a reason for separation of “Entry Level Performance and Conduct—Lack of aptitude for military service,” and was credited with ten months of service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends granting the applicant’s request. ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, states if an individual is ineligible to reenlist or is medically retired or discharged they should have an RE code of “2Q.” She received the wrong RE code on her NGB Form 22. ANGI 36-2002, Note 1, Table 1.9, states “applicants receiving a medically related discharge will require a review by NGB/SGPA. If NGB/SGPA clears the applicant for reenlistment, no waiver for the RE code necessary.” Recommend the applicant’s RE code be changed to “2Q” (medically discharged). The member will still be ineligible to reenlist but she would become eligible if she is cleared by NGB/SGPA. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of NGB/A1PP and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. While we note the comments of NGB/A1PP indicating that this correction may make the applicant eligible to be considered for an enlistment waiver, whether or not she is successful in obtaining such a waiver will be based entirely on the needs of the Air Force, provided she is otherwise qualified, and our recommendation here in no way constitutes a guarantee of the applicant’s future military service. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected as indicated below. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to reflect that she was issued an reentry (RE) code of “2Q” in conjunction with her entry-level separation on 7 June 2013. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03319 in Executive Session on 14 May 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Jul 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, NGB/A1PP, dated 11 Dec 14. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Feb 15.