RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03451 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the award of following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: a. Presidential Unit Citation (Already Awarded) b. Meritorious Unit Award c. Armed Forces Retired Service Commendation Medal d. National Guard Commendation Medal e. Honorable Service Commendation Medal f. USAF Commemorative Medal g. American Defense Commemorative Medal h. Cold War Victory Commemorative Medal APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: These medals may not have been available when he retired. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the United States Air Force - Air National Guard on 29 Jan 66. On 31 Mar 86, the applicant retired and was credited with 20 years, 2 months, and 2 days of active service. The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: - Distinguished Flying Cross - Bronze Star Medal - Air Medal with two Silver Oak Leaf Clusters - Air Force Commendation Medal with one Oak Leaf Cluster - Distinguished Presidential Unit Citation - Combat Readiness Medal with one Oak Leaf Cluster - National Defense Service Medal - Vietnam Service Medal - Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor and one Silver and one Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters - Air Force Longevity Service Award with four Oak Leaf Clusters - Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Oak Leaf Cluster - Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with device and one Oak Leaf Cluster - Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. They conducted a thorough review of the applicant’s personnel record and reviewed the source document provided. The applicant was awarded the Distinguished Presidential Unit Citation as shown on the provided DD Form 214. The applicant does not have sufficient source documentation to be awarded an additional Presidential Unit Citation or a Meritorious Unit Citation. Additionally, the applicant is requesting to be awarded the Armed Forces Retired Service Medal, the National Guard Commendation Medal, the Honorable Service Commendation Medal and the USAF Commemorative Medal, the American Defense Commemorative Medal, and the Cold War Victory Commemorative Medal. These medals are not issued or authorized by the Federal Government, nor can they be worn on the military uniform. They are offered as a purely civilian device to commemorate honorable military service. They recommend the applicant visit a private vendor website or local Base Exchange if he desires these Commemorative Medals. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03451 in Executive Session on 21 Jul 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03451 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Aug 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, ARPC/DPTS, dated 2 Oct 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Feb 15.