RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03649 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: 1. Block 7a, Place of Entry into Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Galveston, TX, rather than Nashville, TN (Administratively Resolved). 2. Block 7b, Home of Record at Time of Entry, be corrected to reflect Galveston, TX, rather than Marrero, LA. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she entered active duty she was a resident of Texas (TX) but her DD Form 214, was never changed to reflect that. She has been a resident of TX for more than five years. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant’s DD Form 24, Application for Appointment as Reserve of the Air Force or USAF without Component, dated 18 Sep 99, Marrero, Louisiana (LA) was annotated as her HOR. On 28 Apr 00, the applicant was commissioned in the grade of second lieutenant (O-1) in the Reserve of the Air Force. On 17 Aug 08, the applicant commenced a period of extended active duty (EAD). On 16 Aug 11, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with three years of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPANF recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The Joint Federal travel Regulation (JFTR) defines the home of record (HOR) as the place recorded as the home of the individual when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty. The HOR can only be changed if there is a break in service of at least one full day. In accordance with the JFTR, the applicant recorded her HOR as Marrero, LA when she commissioned into the Reserve of the Air Force and there was no break in service from when she commissioned to when she accessed to active duty. As such, there is no justification to change the applicant’s HOR. Additionally Appendix A 1 of the JFTR, reads the place of entry into active duty (PLEAD) is addressed as the place at which the member attains a military status or at which the member enters the service. In accordance with the JFTR, the applicant recorded her PLEAD as Galveston, TX and had no breaks in service; therefore her extended active duty order reflected her PLEAD as Galveston, TX when she accessed to active duty. Upon final board decision the applicant’s DD Form 214, dated 16 Aug 11 will be administratively corrected to change: block 7a, Place of Entry into Active Duty, to Galveston, TX. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPANF evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Feb 15, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicant’s place of entry into active duty (PLEAD) was recorded as Galveston, TX, and will correct her records administratively. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting any relief beyond that rendered administratively. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03649 in Executive Session on 18 Jun 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03649 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Aug 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPANF, dated 23 Dec 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Feb 15.