RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03727 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to correct the following errors: 1. His enlistment date be changed from 10 Feb 83 to 10 Feb 82. 2. His discharge date be changed from 12 May 83 to 12 May 82. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: An administrative error resulted in incorrect service dates. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 10 Feb 83, the applicant entered the Air Force Reserve for a term of six years. On 12 May 83, the applicant was released from active duty for completion of initial active duty training, and was credited with 3 and 3 days of active service, and 4 months and 25 days of prior inactive service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. According to the applicant’s DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States, he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 15 Sep 82 [in the delayed enlistment program]. According to his DD Form 214, he attended basic training and technical training from 10 Feb 83 through 12 May 83. The applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve on 14 Sep 88, as documented on Reserve Order CA-018865. The applicant’s service dates are correct as documented in his official record and he has provided no evidence they are recorded in error. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4 Apr 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. 4. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03727 in Executive Session on 21 May 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Sep 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, ARPC/DPTT, dated 10 Mar 15. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Apr 15.